Key in a search term below to search our website.
This extravagant, highly impractical gown would have been worn at royal occasions. Putting it on and moving in it took skill and practice!
Silk, gilt metal, linen
The skirt is nearly 2.5m wide.
Fashion and Style, Level 1, National Museum of Scotland
Did you know?
This mantua came into the Museum’s possession from the Earl of Haddington and had been kept at Tyninghame house, near Dunbar. As Tyninghame was the principle country house of the Earls of Haddington until the 1980s, it is likely that the mantua either belonged to the Countess of Haddington, or one of the Earl of Haddington’s close female relations.
For court wear in the early 18th century, women wore the open-fronted mantua, with a train and matching petticoat. To give the figure the required shape, stays (an 18th century precursor to the corset) and hooped petticoat, or panniers, were worn underneath. Designed to reflect the wearer’s status, mantuas were typically decorated with opulent embroidery incorporating gold or silver thread or gilt lace.
The mantua was worn only on specific royal occasions, such as receptions at Hampton Court and St James’s Palace in London. The King’s birthday was one of the man celebratory events of the year, when the nobility would gather in London and commission new clothes. It’s possible that the mantua was made for one of George II’s birthdays (10th November) as gold brocade fabrics were usual for this event: the firm of William Sharp in 1752 advertised a ‘great variety of gold and silver brocade for ladies, and rich waistcoat stuff for gentleman’s wear, entirely new, for the ensuing birthday and winter wear’.
The wide skirts of the mantua reflect the contemporary fashion, but their extreme exaggeration is purely a court affectation. In Britain the shape remained largely the same for many years, with only minimal changes in the formation of the train, or the fashionable pattern of the silk.
It is rare for mantuas to survive in such excellent condition and the museum is particularly lucky to know the family this belonged to.
The skirts of the mantua were used to show off luxurious fabrics that reflected a wearer’s wealth, taste and status. The use of gold, silver and silk, as well as the technical skill required to weave such complex patterns made these fabrics very expensive. Although we cannot know the exact cost, it is probable that the fabric of this dress would cost around the equivalent of £5,000 today.
The mantua came from Tynninghame, near Dunbar, which became the principal country residence of the 1st Earl of Haddington in 1628 and remained so until the 1980s. Through marriage in the 18th century, the Earls of Haddington became connected to Mellerstain house, where the current Earl of Haddington lives. The National Museum of Scotland has around 162 items previously owned by the Earls of Haddington in the fashion and textile collection, dating from around 1720-1900.
The dress dates to when Thomas, 7th Earl of Haddington held the title and estates. In 1750 he married Mary Holt, widow of Gresham Lloyd, who became known as the Countess of Haddington. The Earl and the Countess appear to have led a socially active life with their peers, with their attendance at balls and hunts reported by Lloyd’s Evening Post. It is likely that this mantua may have belonged to Mary, Countess of Haddington, or another close female relation such as Mary’s daughter.
It was a skilled practice to wear a mantua, from putting it on to learning to walk and dance in it. There were many layers underneath including stockings, held with a garter, a linen or cotton shift and stays, which fastened at the back. The hooped petticoat would have been arranged on the floor with the outer skirts over it for the lady to step into; both were then pulled up and tied at the waist. Small hip pads, or panniers, may also have been added at the waist to support the width of the skirt. The bodice and the stomacher – the triangular insert of fabric which sits in the open front of the garment – was arranged and pinned or sewn to the stays at the front. Finally, it was accessorized with the finest European lace and jewels. The process required the assistance of a lady’s maid, who would have been expected to attend their mistress for any change of clothes.
The layers of clothing were heavy and cumbersome and women had to take the time and trouble to practice the decorum of wearing the court mantua. In the novel Belinda, written in 1801, Lady Delacour laughs at the absurdity of the situation:
“Every body wears hoops, but how few - 'tis a melancholy consideration! - how very few can manage them. There's my friend lady C----- in an elegant undress; she passes for very genteel, but put her in a hoop and she looks as pitiable a figure - as much a prisoner - and as little able to walk as a child in a go-cart.- Lady Delacour, Belinda, 1801
The mantua underwent over 100 hours of conservation treatment, which included surface-cleaning the garment, humidifying creases, supporting weak joins and areas of loss and reattaching loose gilt threads. You can read more about the painstaking conservation process in this blog post.
Mounting historic garments for display reveals much about the body shape of the original wearer. The fashionable shape of the torso at this time was much more conical with a flatter, smoother bust line, fashioned by the rigid stays worn by ladies in the 18th century.
To support the mantua on display and to achieve the fashionable silhouette of the 1750s, our costume mounting specialist made a replica hooped petticoat. This in turn is supported by an acrylic structure made for us by The Museum Workshop at the same time as the bespoke acrylic mannequin. The costume mounter also had to make padded arms, which are stitched onto the acrylic torso, and a replica stomacher, as stomachers original to 18th century open-fronted dresses rarely survive. You can see the process in action here: